- 註冊時間
- 2023-5-6
- 精華
- 在線時間
- 小時
- 米币
-
- 最後登錄
- 1970-1-1
累計簽到:5 天 連續簽到:1 天
|
Sexual Precocity in a 16-Month-Old/ c5 m/ ~8 S0 b2 J
Boy Induced by Indirect Topical+ B1 t- G- N% d
Exposure to Testosterone5 v" s1 U ^5 \1 I
Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,1 Tracy Ricke, MD,21 C# S7 [/ a8 q- E! P6 `
and Kenneth R. Rettig, MD1
4 X: x5 q, }% \) j3 wClinical Pediatrics* o. I/ l. H/ }# U& ?
Volume 46 Number 6
6 a3 |" }* w6 ]0 U1 Z6 x& DJuly 2007 540-543
# o+ ^( j2 A. }4 @2 x© 2007 Sage Publications
: g; W5 U4 H4 x: {; J10.1177/0009922806296651
1 Q4 z/ c" h e. ^ g, Rhttp://clp.sagepub.com
; r$ R# a$ U; n. w( q) p! Mhosted at
# k" i6 j- R; l9 M- O, q! Y o: |* Ihttp://online.sagepub.com
# D8 O- `! W/ w* ~+ E' j9 _9 V/ CPrecocious puberty in boys, central or peripheral,% h# b+ _9 A1 O( `8 J4 Z
is a significant concern for physicians. Central7 E& [. I( Y/ w3 c8 a T
precocious puberty (CPP), which is mediated
2 H7 R5 \6 r! A+ u* F- `/ Nthrough the hypothalamic pituitary gonadal axis, has
% |, v$ T" S4 h* ca higher incidence of organic central nervous system
, f7 I7 o% S( R& c* r- t: p/ plesions in boys.1,2 Virilization in boys, as manifested1 j( `3 \$ n1 q$ H0 R
by enlargement of the penis, development of pubic w# |; @. r; j# H& R0 w* N
hair, and facial acne without enlargement of testi-) L3 ~/ H; T' m/ P% j" [9 K3 u
cles, suggests peripheral or pseudopuberty.1-3 We
3 F* J3 U' `4 I$ D7 l! greport a 16-month-old boy who presented with the
9 J9 K8 k6 z1 venlargement of the phallus and pubic hair develop-& n8 {3 \& q* ^" H5 z1 P3 M1 g! K
ment without testicular enlargement, which was due
5 q4 s5 e% t0 xto the unintentional exposure to androgen gel used by
3 |. L: R3 q" e- ^! ^+ {the father. The family initially concealed this infor-' G2 O3 x4 b+ y1 M
mation, resulting in an extensive work-up for this4 k* D" o. k! ]- v' h' {
child. Given the widespread and easy availability of6 `+ E+ Y2 ]+ X/ c |4 s7 V
testosterone gel and cream, we believe this is proba-: |% z' R+ I4 ^; V% Z) I
bly more common than the rare case report in the+ d* e0 G# q. \: Y U% _, I
literature.4
) m0 e2 j+ x/ M6 UPatient Report8 Q3 L6 R6 f8 Y: Q: b& d
A 16-month-old white child was referred to the/ B+ ]1 J. c# X6 \' a9 X0 D
endocrine clinic by his pediatrician with the concern
, C* w- e* l- C* Pof early sexual development. His mother noticed
- A' C+ L$ W: Y& q9 i0 e4 o4 I4 Rlight colored pubic hair development when he was
/ J) O$ d2 E- q Y5 fFrom the 1Division of Pediatric Endocrinology, 2University of# g0 q( I: H" s
South Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, Alabama.
4 d! z$ {9 O) N+ v+ nAddress correspondence to: Samar K. Bhowmick, MD, FACE,) h1 Y# t8 O% T
Professor of Pediatrics, University of South Alabama, College of
! P; Z1 W s LMedicine, 2451 Fillingim St. Mastin 212, Mobile, AL 36617-2297;, p9 E+ t+ t+ y9 i/ V: o
e-mail: [email protected].& @ l9 a6 N3 W, _
about 6 to 7 months old, which progressively became3 o1 k0 g3 u/ o$ x2 {$ Q- v
darker. She was also concerned about the enlarge-
7 {! f- n8 J( Q/ w9 Lment of his penis and frequent erections. The child3 l8 @/ L8 W6 d& X- a. P c) m F
was the product of a full-term normal delivery, with
- ~9 b, l9 [- c \6 [( N3 q* ja birth weight of 7 lb 14 oz, and birth length of
- N! N* U6 r( ^2 u20 inches. He was breast-fed throughout the first year0 C; \7 Z$ K) I# J: m; @
of life and was still receiving breast milk along with( t- K! W+ ?+ h0 M1 T% e
solid food. He had no hospitalizations or surgery,
, @8 P1 [! D q: i2 v' P- qand his psychosocial and psychomotor development9 ] [* Z, w9 V v
was age appropriate.
9 j) v) J# e4 fThe family history was remarkable for the father,
: d$ ]7 @) m1 Y; iwho was diagnosed with hypothyroidism at age 16,& \# b: P+ T, W. y- f6 p
which was treated with thyroxine. The father’s
; r' [5 ~, @# u/ kheight was 6 feet, and he went through a somewhat5 C* ^# m5 P' }8 R$ {
early puberty and had stopped growing by age 14.- z) j1 s- F1 N( A
The father denied taking any other medication. The9 @, C( }6 u0 p; z4 c/ h9 {
child’s mother was in good health. Her menarche
% a& m& x. @" P1 i! Bwas at 11 years of age, and her height was at 5 feet
) C. h8 M# Q7 b5 inches. There was no other family history of pre-5 N, R0 T; O; Z: p- | @5 X
cocious sexual development in the first-degree rela-
: u+ Z" M: P0 atives. There were no siblings.
# H) g8 U# A. X0 i2 M4 pPhysical Examination& ^7 n; g& g! g$ x: X
The physical examination revealed a very active,
8 q% ^7 ^9 k9 C# zplayful, and healthy boy. The vital signs documented, v' X* ^& C. a9 s/ D U) Y
a blood pressure of 85/50 mm Hg, his length was
! o5 R% ?( k5 t7 ^, \90 cm (>97th percentile), and his weight was 14.4 kg' v; W* `. N S
(also >97th percentile). The observed yearly growth
. I; f. v/ O$ fvelocity was 30 cm (12 inches). The examination of
0 @, u1 d% L. h' D, z+ C5 mthe neck revealed no thyroid enlargement.
0 K; B. @# K7 ~+ O' wThe genitourinary examination was remarkable for) R4 F6 V& _. K/ i: @4 G- O. ^1 H8 L6 o
enlargement of the penis, with a stretched length of
- i5 I$ Y: F% v$ P% |) i8 cm and a width of 2 cm. The glans penis was very well
' A- }2 v& {- h) u" y Qdeveloped. The pubic hair was Tanner II, mostly around
, B9 ^. B4 W3 Y- p5 [0 M540- j6 Q6 y8 Z$ [- E, D5 ?. D
at University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from
+ v, Z( H) U& g8 _the base of the phallus and was dark and curled. The
% R, c2 p/ U! Z4 t2 c6 t0 y( Otesticular volume was prepubertal at 2 mL each.4 G3 U' v: \8 h: Q! R0 O7 N
The skin was moist and smooth and somewhat
E3 z' p- O* J$ N+ ioily. No axillary hair was noted. There were no+ K# H7 e# x' i
abnormal skin pigmentations or café-au-lait spots.
! r4 p& W7 r9 Q) H) PNeurologic evaluation showed deep tendon reflex 2+
- J' M2 K( ^( k! M: T) Y obilateral and symmetrical. There was no suggestion$ [, [4 C2 p8 v, M1 v# f8 j: V& \7 q0 d
of papilledema.
* M" _: @# |) a4 a3 l' r/ j# jLaboratory Evaluation
& ^6 V/ U' u8 i7 |2 `0 Z+ d6 {$ JThe bone age was consistent with 28 months by
* ~/ g$ ]7 z$ e3 z7 @' o musing the standard of Greulich and Pyle at a chrono-" H; R9 L+ _% l& U/ }' Z4 D7 L
logic age of 16 months (advanced).5 Chromosomal
% L" S+ S* X: L0 g8 dkaryotype was 46XY. The thyroid function test
! o# L% Z! Z1 A' ~9 f e$ vshowed a free T4 of 1.69 ng/dL, and thyroid stimu-
7 ?9 F9 Y; {- jlating hormone level was 1.3 µIU/mL (both normal).
1 k% j& O4 ]. p2 N) gThe concentrations of serum electrolytes, blood6 [9 ~, Y6 O$ @% F
urea nitrogen, creatinine, and calcium all were- x- v; i* C# q9 f: Q* d8 e) p$ f
within normal range for his age. The concentration
% f! y9 e! a. d& T. nof serum 17-hydroxyprogesterone was 16 ng/dL6 O" q& q/ v& `- j" H9 t
(normal, 3 to 90 ng/dL), androstenedione was 207 X( a% A9 \0 n# N/ }& W
ng/dL (normal, 18 to 80 ng/dL), dehydroepiandros-
8 h# j8 b/ a" W. K* t3 L& Aterone was 38 ng/dL (normal, 50 to 760 ng/dL),
: q: o( c0 e. {& idesoxycorticosterone was 4.3 ng/dL (normal, 7 to) F( G/ v" ~# z y
49ng/dL), 11-desoxycortisol (specific compound S), l: c0 |7 y `4 b
was 43 ng/dL (normal, 10 to 156 ng/dL), serum cor-
7 `% z* C6 l+ K# q! }) D7 {tisol was 7.6 µg/dL (normal, 2.8 to 23 µg/dL), total
& j4 f. ^3 G; Vtestosterone was 60 ng/dL (normal <3 to 10 ng/dL),
0 V/ x/ v# e* P5 yand β-human chorionic gonadotropin was less than
8 _- l7 A; `3 @4 ?" {& {# D5 mIU/mL (normal <5 mIU/mL). Serum follicular; I) p" \; q! u* M5 I: Q+ B+ o) F
stimulating hormone and leuteinizing hormone
& C, x. \0 x; ?' N1 X0 v& Dconcentrations were less than 0.05 mIU/mL
/ [1 Q3 J# {- y o# p" o( ~(prepubertal).
: M: s4 {& d6 m8 s* F1 zThe parents were notified about the laboratory
+ v3 P" r }; M2 Zresults and were informed that all of the tests were7 M) W. j) C+ r
normal except the testosterone level was high. The
1 d* b, v3 S- i& [follow-up visit was arranged within a few weeks to# e* Y+ K! {# k t
obtain testicular and abdominal sonograms; how-
' k) g# p! E7 N Gever, the family did not return for 4 months.
: I' P! C: M" L) zPhysical examination at this time revealed that the
2 H6 B- y6 X4 d3 l6 Wchild had grown 2.5 cm in 4 months and had gained# s+ T8 Q4 e, Y5 u) L. B( J
2 kg of weight. Physical examination remained* i" _& F6 f* V$ a+ \' D! B
unchanged. Surprisingly, the pubic hair almost com-
4 p* ^+ @5 e4 K* Cpletely disappeared except for a few vellous hairs at
9 P9 J6 J, P0 X' {- C6 g4 J7 Nthe base of the phallus. Testicular volume was still 2" g4 x7 H/ H' O$ _ w
mL, and the size of the penis remained unchanged., o8 v) j2 u H7 w, b- |6 j
The mother also said that the boy was no longer hav-6 n5 o; O1 ?: i) L# {# [
ing frequent erections." j n3 k5 b, h8 V; @' P
Both parents were again questioned about use of
/ A5 M3 x8 l0 V' g0 T+ Kany ointment/creams that they may have applied to
! u z- r/ d7 fthe child’s skin. This time the father admitted the
/ Y! o$ C0 R, L% W) wTopical Testosterone Exposure / Bhowmick et al 541
/ I; ]+ o- C0 s% Vuse of testosterone gel twice daily that he was apply-0 j5 j, |6 u- P3 C, V1 X
ing over his own shoulders, chest, and back area for3 ~6 J5 m" o- J9 I
a year. The father also revealed he was embarrassed* {+ Z3 Q" f* W" S; k7 l
to disclose that he was using a testosterone gel pre-
5 T1 b# U& J" K/ j3 fscribed by his family physician for decreased libido
; t# C* Y+ U& B! @secondary to depression.
/ `1 ~4 n2 g6 T$ W& A& TThe child slept in the same bed with parents.- S1 L* h5 a4 q5 l. a
The father would hug the baby and hold him on his
9 @6 M" m: y, j9 S$ Ychest for a considerable period of time, causing sig-9 Q# u. T; g# j
nificant bare skin contact between baby and father.
( T7 `1 }, }& V7 q+ R& J" P" n t. DThe father also admitted that after the phone call,
+ y/ H F' R. _8 T" h; f, t6 i# ?when he learned the testosterone level in the baby
5 j) c' ~& T0 s u+ U7 U( _7 Swas high, he then read the product information
! S h% N) a* g2 wpacket and concluded that it was most likely the rea-
5 r$ Y1 o3 j8 h5 Z1 M2 Wson for the child’s virilization. At that time, they, v& M4 a9 T$ _- J8 Y) P7 [
decided to put the baby in a separate bed, and the3 ?9 Z/ C; H" L! a# @$ X
father was not hugging him with bare skin and had
% V/ U, R5 z9 _ V' Rbeen using protective clothing. A repeat testosterone# ~1 w8 L3 W$ |6 H9 Q1 d
test was ordered, but the family did not go to the
3 s2 C& A7 X2 [, K, }9 Hlaboratory to obtain the test.
, x$ U1 S6 r7 x+ m. C Q# ?Discussion
# s N+ M. F2 N3 W6 y2 ?, ?Precocious puberty in boys is defined as secondary
: o' C i9 c6 T3 Nsexual development before 9 years of age.1,4/ B( G. Y( p8 N
Precocious puberty is termed as central (true) when+ P; W4 m ]& ~/ \& _/ s; Y& V. J- L
it is caused by the premature activation of hypo-
$ e! Q0 F4 @8 z9 Fthalamic pituitary gonadal axis. CPP is more com-( R3 L( ]. `# }% k
mon in girls than in boys.1,3 Most boys with CPP( W4 i) p' p U8 y0 s# T
may have a central nervous system lesion that is
' F3 \; z( G: @5 m" n. W' Nresponsible for the early activation of the hypothal-
# Q. e* y U$ G% }- Damic pituitary gonadal axis.1-3 Thus, greater empha-
* o4 \, ^! W4 d2 ^/ zsis has been given to neuroradiologic imaging in
0 C( [& L- @& g( ]( ~" dboys with precocious puberty. In addition to viril-( |5 A# g; j7 Z' I8 g
ization, the clinical hallmark of CPP is the symmet-+ d+ ^" _3 _/ e, g, J2 a. [
rical testicular growth secondary to stimulation by% x }6 \2 }5 N6 t: f
gonadotropins.1,3+ G) ^6 n, x1 r$ F0 C
Gonadotropin-independent peripheral preco- m; ]0 }% W: [" R
cious puberty in boys also results from inappropriate
& |3 N8 N0 K6 h( R% `androgenic stimulation from either endogenous or
, S0 {3 B1 c. Eexogenous sources, nonpituitary gonadotropin stim-) E# z6 O$ b% c4 l3 k. B
ulation, and rare activating mutations.3 Virilizing; y8 x% n: ~# _) r
congenital adrenal hyperplasia producing excessive6 M5 s; W) S# j T- U6 B! \
adrenal androgens is a common cause of precocious
0 |) y$ f$ J- ?$ U% c" upuberty in boys.3,4
& I. r% ^9 h+ ~6 k$ tThe most common form of congenital adrenal' @; B( D: N+ I2 z! n T4 f/ I
hyperplasia is the 21-hydroxylase enzyme deficiency.
& ]- h) W; S0 h/ \The 11-β hydroxylase deficiency may also result in
7 {1 \9 @' x1 U' b+ a- }& Mexcessive adrenal androgen production, and rarely,- M$ F/ v9 k) J8 f
an adrenal tumor may also cause adrenal androgen
# v6 D% t+ k$ r* w$ W- eexcess.1,3
" M; Y: i; R) Tat University of Manchester Library on May 25, 2015 cpj.sagepub.com Downloaded from, j' O8 A6 V8 u2 B" i4 S) h
542 Clinical Pediatrics / Vol. 46, No. 6, July 20074 ^7 y5 F9 d1 O5 K u+ L
A unique entity of male-limited gonadotropin-# W2 Z6 i3 A2 ^& f
independent precocious puberty, which is also known
. Z" C2 o+ w/ A3 W( B: _6 s* Q' nas testotoxicosis, may cause precocious puberty at a% d' |* i0 Y" F6 }" p& M" x
very young age. The physical findings in these boys7 W5 q' _6 }! M- `3 X
with this disorder are full pubertal development,
3 Q0 N4 G- z t5 C4 x1 Mincluding bilateral testicular growth, similar to boys
e4 T6 e% O' j( k5 [& G( O) \7 Gwith CPP. The gonadotropin levels in this disorder
1 t2 V3 Q/ i% Aare suppressed to prepubertal levels and do not show* Z1 u7 ~8 X2 e7 Q- z& O
pubertal response of gonadotropin after gonadotropin-
7 M5 }" E; f$ C. @ a" |3 areleasing hormone stimulation. This is a sex-linked4 R' Z) p, x9 I, k
autosomal dominant disorder that affects only
! J. t1 C( D# ?+ Lmales; therefore, other male members of the family
( F) W; p! O" e8 Y. I% M8 Rmay have similar precocious puberty.3
/ }. l. `" o. m vIn our patient, physical examination was incon-9 ]. l( Y, z' W H5 l$ Q2 K
sistent with true precocious puberty since his testi-- W5 i m) F& ~9 ]
cles were prepubertal in size. However, testotoxicosis
, v4 \# Z. H# y x4 v( {was in the differential diagnosis because his father
5 F+ n# B3 r# h" f' Dstarted puberty somewhat early, and occasionally,/ L+ r% h: j7 ?" c$ E) F
testicular enlargement is not that evident in the2 W! e; X. K# N& i
beginning of this process.1 In the absence of a neg-4 t7 Y: ~ [; ]
ative initial history of androgen exposure, our
' U x: o' x" v7 A* mbiggest concern was virilizing adrenal hyperplasia,( s% ]. e3 u4 S/ b
either 21-hydroxylase deficiency or 11-β hydroxylase a3 ?6 F/ Y8 I: f9 O5 k2 `9 X7 w
deficiency. Those diagnoses were excluded by find-
" M+ r5 W) Z' T) u* ?ing the normal level of adrenal steroids.
( r! G) o& [+ b+ ]6 J j" NThe diagnosis of exogenous androgens was strongly2 V9 T" l. j/ u7 E3 u
suspected in a follow-up visit after 4 months because
7 n- E+ Q- q/ Vthe physical examination revealed the complete disap-
- A+ R8 N. @3 a2 {! |* Rpearance of pubic hair, normal growth velocity, and
; `5 |6 k- D+ X( ]+ b# Xdecreased erections. The father admitted using a testos-
# ]( P# d/ S5 ]' C6 ~( qterone gel, which he concealed at first visit. He was& b' V, L7 x( M! P2 ^- i0 H, E9 l, Z
using it rather frequently, twice a day. The Physicians’7 z/ |, ?% b( i! k1 s, ]% V
Desk Reference, or package insert of this product, gel or
# k6 w' |6 z, c4 \2 Lcream, cautions about dermal testosterone transfer to, K9 \" _$ s$ n) w9 c
unprotected females through direct skin exposure.
3 D% q' h& h: r7 dSerum testosterone level was found to be 2 times the& p0 w( {0 m7 t9 G9 Y
baseline value in those females who were exposed to
\% R: G6 H* ]+ Geven 15 minutes of direct skin contact with their male
+ O% |$ E) G5 a. I8 apartners.6 However, when a shirt covered the applica-9 Q t2 ^2 a: k0 X2 V3 g3 d
tion site, this testosterone transfer was prevented.
{1 x8 n. ^8 M0 Z2 ~6 D8 ]% tOur patient’s testosterone level was 60 ng/mL,
: F! ]4 S+ R, L% b% `3 kwhich was clearly high. Some studies suggest that: d: e- _' r a2 {! ]9 Y
dermal conversion of testosterone to dihydrotestos-2 ~, p" M5 `' U$ M, }2 h
terone, which is a more potent metabolite, is more
6 d% k9 a8 ?& L6 C. H9 G& Wactive in young children exposed to testosterone
1 ^- O. x! U6 I' B0 ?exogenously7; however, we did not measure a dihy-4 e, n% b' h1 h) v8 j8 G
drotestosterone level in our patient. In addition to
1 S1 D8 r: k* K: Hvirilization, exposure to exogenous testosterone in
2 J4 H0 C2 a. S- n$ i Bchildren results in an increase in growth velocity and- t, A5 d5 v X& i# K$ W6 m; v
advanced bone age, as seen in our patient.
& _: T6 Q- N3 DThe long-term effect of androgen exposure during
2 k/ Y! F+ z' X2 {2 B5 w ^early childhood on pubertal development and final
- X6 ~/ L- g# _4 p$ L1 u& C4 Kadult height are not fully known and always remain
+ w0 h1 @! m; S5 F. ]a concern. Children treated with short-term testos-
' f3 K! y" J, }; Q |terone injection or topical androgen may exhibit some% T0 B/ P) L% o& F
acceleration of the skeletal maturation; however, after! l* c3 {( x, o, N$ b4 I
cessation of treatment, the rate of bone maturation
% l3 {! P$ ~8 B) U# T4 |; W6 {decelerates and gradually returns to normal.8,9. X- y4 W2 T2 \. o8 Y$ A
There are conflicting reports and controversy6 |. _) I1 R% w# A2 n; r( x* ^% f
over the effect of early androgen exposure on adult, D2 z, E& p5 |2 P3 E+ `
penile length.10,11 Some reports suggest subnormal
+ O( O) @; Z r0 X! {( B! U9 B' x! vadult penile length, apparently because of downreg-
3 d6 X' l0 L' |' e! e' `ulation of androgen receptor number.10,12 However,) c" L5 \. |. q; ^7 a
Sutherland et al13 did not find a correlation between
3 X7 n$ Q1 U$ ?+ A7 ~! mchildhood testosterone exposure and reduced adult
% _% `( w$ \. i3 C6 Zpenile length in clinical studies.8 l; d9 \8 J* E' }
Nonetheless, we do not believe our patient is
' ~: t4 Q% s6 }. e/ A5 f N- p8 \going to experience any of the untoward effects from
- ~) y- P+ v* t8 W$ \testosterone exposure as mentioned earlier because
# a" h0 Y/ {5 Z- qthe exposure was not for a prolonged period of time.( m( }& ` O# C
Although the bone age was advanced at the time of" Z$ l3 E( @& \0 O
diagnosis, the child had a normal growth velocity at5 j) c- H* ? A6 o* x- S# `
the follow-up visit. It is hoped that his final adult7 h) M3 m" L' b1 Y: P2 y
height will not be affected.
}0 \; q$ z! [' h% I$ g/ z% J6 [Although rarely reported, the widespread avail-+ T# f! g; q7 c6 D7 A3 X) J: h0 M
ability of androgen products in our society may h3 h" [. W: c7 |3 t8 g! ~
indeed cause more virilization in male or female% r& j9 O, y1 q6 G& A4 H9 f
children than one would realize. Exposure to andro-8 u5 b- X. F- @. L' P# G
gen products must be considered and specific ques-5 T" k/ Z4 j' h3 n" |0 R# A
tioning about the use of a testosterone product or
2 p' b" U$ e) A+ Q( g, k" kgel should be asked of the family members during
2 k( |1 v+ i5 h$ R+ k2 A$ x2 }8 hthe evaluation of any children who present with vir-
. N1 E6 q0 H7 Z/ `" K# u( }ilization or peripheral precocious puberty. The diag-% _& r/ N9 z4 j2 h( Z
nosis can be established by just a few tests and by
& p' S" {2 R: O' zappropriate history. The inability to obtain such a
6 g6 N. c+ |1 x* `history, or failure to ask the specific questions, may" Z2 J; w7 R0 z7 ^7 ]2 g
result in extensive, unnecessary, and expensive. M D0 p; T2 p, c$ Y; O, O8 V+ ]
investigation. The primary care physician should be
5 p+ P% l* A' u. g: ], ~aware of this fact, because most of these children% E* i1 \6 Y" |, O7 d/ D& Q
may initially present in their practice. The Physicians’
7 Y5 E# `# I) u/ g; H4 vDesk Reference and package insert should also put a
( s% W/ S5 H6 K- n! }warning about the virilizing effect on a male or% F0 \. e' W8 J2 V5 b5 u
female child who might come in contact with some-) V; F8 ~" P/ W& p
one using any of these products.
% K7 Z0 X9 L# ~& R8 T) RReferences g# k) y' \0 [. i+ D
1. Styne DM. The testes: disorder of sexual differentiation
5 V! j% d+ n1 l- w; K5 [and puberty in the male. In: Sperling MA, ed. Pediatric! }7 i/ s$ x9 ]7 V0 m
Endocrinology. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunders;
8 |1 t# U5 N( d6 S0 `2002: 565-628.
3 E/ F! g4 P: j4 ~2. Rivarola M, Belgorosky A, Mendilaharzu H, et al. Precocious
9 v2 b9 d' k2 k& e0 qpuberty in children with tumours of the suprasellar pineal |
|